爱尔兰历史学论文代写：有效合同

在这个场景中,彼得和所有者之间的合同是口服或口头合同。彼得显示他的意图购买木材,使业主。他提供一个有效的提供沟通业主,而且使明示条款支付£50,并保证不销售给其他人。他的建议是有效的,因为它已经口头传达给业主和业主的验收也是有效的,因为他已经向彼得,他不会把木材卖给任何人。都有一个打算创建法律关系,因此这个元素也存在。考虑的元素,确定性和能力也存在,因此它是一个有效的合同。现在是对双方有约束力履行合同的条款。最初,违反合同的条款已经被彼得不承诺当天回去。根据彼得的承诺,他应该从业主收集木材在同一天晚上,但他并没有出现。正式,主人容易等彼得直到晚上,但是彼得到第二天,所以违约已经提交。在这个场景中,彼得不能从业主提出索赔或补偿,正如他自己没有履行合同的条款。

爱尔兰历史学论文代写：有效合同

In this scenario, the contract between Peter and the owner is an oral or verbal contract. Peter shows his intention of purchasing the timber and makes an offer to the owner. His offer is a valid offer as he communicates it to the owner, and moreover, makes express terms by paying £ 50 and taking assurances not to sale it to someone else. His offer is a valid one as it has been verbally communicated to the owner and the owner’s acceptance is also valid as he has assured Peter that he will not sell the timber to anyone else. Both have an intention to create a legal relation, hence this element also exists. The elements of consideration, certainty and capacity are also present hence it is a valid contract. Now it is binding upon both the parties to fulfil the terms of the contract. Initially, the breach of the terms of the contract has been committed by Peter who does not go back the same day. According to Peter’s promise, he is supposed to collect the timber from the owner on the same day in the evening, but he does not show up. Officially, the owner is liable to wait for Peter till the evening, but as Peter arrives the next day, so the breach of contract has already been committed. In this scenario, Peter cannot claim any damages or compensation from the owner, as he himself did not fulfil the terms of the contract.