代写论文:纳税人

代写论文:纳税人

根據1936年漸進所得稅評估法,為了改變所得稅的含義和應用,正在描述稅收條款的一般扣除。這部分被描述為稅收立法的簡單部分,從而有助於向納稅人提供有關扣除收入的信息(Krever and Black,2007)。一般的扣除似乎表明,納稅人可以輕易要求損失或獲得應稅收入所產生的支出。因此,在這種情況下,正在對扣除已發生的收入進行測試。根據立法,在這種情況下,為了扣除收入,兒童保育費用並未確定。

代写论文:纳税人
上下班費用的例子似乎與包括在所得稅形式中扣除的收入關係密切。因此,旅行費用和其他費用,如衣服和食物據說是納稅人的一部分,但不包括在賺取收入的過程中(Moss,2015)。出於這個原因,澳大利亞法院決定,無論是在職父母照顧兒童的費用,還是旅行費用和食品費用等旅行費用,都不包括在創收過程中。因此這些成本不能以納稅人的稅收形式扣除。

代写论文:纳税人

As per the Progressive Income Tax Assessment Act of 1936, the general deduction of the tax provision is being depicted for changing the meaning and the application of the income tax. This section is described as the straightforward section for the tax legislation and thereby it helps in providing the taxpayer regarding the deduction of the income (Krever and Black, 2007). The general deduction seems to indicate that a taxpayer can easily claim losses or the outgoings incurred in the earning of assessable income. Therefore, the test regarding the deduction of incurred income is being indicated in this case. As per the legislation, childcare expenses are not decided in this case for the purpose of deducting the income.

代写论文:纳税人
The example of the cost of traveling to and from work seems to be having an ample connection with the income which is included for being deducted as in the form of the income tax. Therefore, the travel expense and the other expenses such as the clothing and the food are said to be put on the part of the taxpayer but are not included in the part of the income-earning process (Moss, 2015). For this reason, the court of the Australia decided that whether the cost of the childcare for a working parent or the traveling costs such as the travel and the food costs will not be included in the part of the income-earning process. Therefore these costs are not deductible in the form of the tax from the taxpayer.