代写论文：文章修饰
在选择句子任务的来源时，有必要考虑两个不同的来源。首先，选择的源必须具有真实的主观变化。主观的变化是必要的，以确定两个来源在修辞上的不同，以及来源如何利用事实和其他的。所选的第一个来源是一篇非学术性的文章。这篇文章没有遵循学术文献中使用的惯例;然而，这篇文章确实使用了修辞风格，这对陈述论点是有效的。在学术文章中，施密特(2017)的文章更直接地指出了这一点。这个消息源之所以被选中，是因为它简明扼要。它提出了文化契合的工作，直接攻击这个概念，并提出一个论点，为什么它不适合直接引用。另一方面，纳泽尔(2005)的学术研究也遵循了更主观的标准和惯例。虽然第一个来源可以被每个人阅读，但来自不同文化的人会带着一撮盐。他们不会完全信任它。然而，第二篇学术文章在学术规范中更加主观和明确，对于不同文化的人来说更有说服力。
代写论文：文章修饰
In choosing sources for the sentence task, it was necessary to consider two different sources. Firstly, the source selected had to have real subjective variations. The subjective variations are necessary to identify how the two sources differ in rhetoric and how the sources made use of facts and others. The first source selected was a non-academic article. The article did not follow the conventions used in an academic source; however, the article did make use of rhetoric style that was effective to state its argument. It was observed that more than the academic article, Schmidt (2017) article was more direct in making its point. The source was mainly selected because it was succinct and to the point. It presented the work on cultural-fit, by directly attacking the concept and presenting an argument on why it was not appropriate with a direct quote. On the other hand, the academic work of Nazir (2005) is seen to follow norms and conventions that follow a more subjective setting. While the first source could be read by everybody, people from different cultures will take it with a pinch of salt. They would not trust it completely. Nevertheless, the second academic article in being more subjective and defined within academic norms would be more persuasive content for people of different cultures.
