essay代写价格－信用评级机构。信用评级机构未能预测到亚洲和墨西哥的金融危机，除了其他原因外，原因在于该机构没有考虑到国际流动性和或有负债。信用评级机构可以被认为是在较短的时间内反对评级的逆转。标准普尔和穆迪都认为，就相对信用风险而言，评级处于稳定状态。穆迪称，这似乎符合机构投资者和发行人的需求。这种稳定评级的愿望反映了一种观点，即越来越稳定的评级可以被认为是更好的评级(Dufour et al.， 2012)。接下来论文范文essay代写价格－信用评级机构分享给留学生阅读。
The failure of credit rating agencies in predicting the financial crises of Asia and Mexico was due, out of rest of the things, with the fact that international liquidity and contingent liability had not been considered by the agency. In concern with the crisis of Asia, an acknowledgment was made by Moody’s that they ended up confronting a new combination of circumstance with the requirement of paradigm shift with key focus on the below mentioned areas (Dardour, 2013):
Increased analytical focus over the risks in context with short-term debt for the ones that might have been creditworthy nations
Huge emphasis over the creditworthiness and identity of the short-term borrowers of a nation
Increased appreciation of risks perceived as a result of weak system of banking
Increased attention to the likely behaviour and identity of international creditors of short term
Enhanced sensitivity towards the risk that the event of financial crisis across one nation can result in contagion impacts for a number of other nations
It is important to find a balance between stability and accuracy of the trade-off. Agencies of credit rating can be considered as averse to the ratings of reversal in a shorter duration of time. Both Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s hold the intension of ratings for being stabilized measures with respect to relative risk on credit. Moody’s claimed that this appears to be corresponding with the demands of institutional investors as well as issuers. This desire for stabilizing ratings provide a reflection of the view that increasingly stabilized ratings can be considered as better ratings (Dufour et al., 2012). It has been argued by an economist measurement of failures are on the basis of stability of rating. While some lowest ratings being exceptions, his definition of failed rating was the one raised or lowered in terms of three or more than three notches in the period of 12 months. Choosing three notches is relation with the smaller probability of a change in three notch rating among agencies of credit ratings. When this definition is applied to the long-term sovereign ratings of foreign currency over Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s between the period of 1997 and 2002, it can be stated that both Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s failed during the crisis of Asia. Standard and Poor’s also ended up failing during the crisis of Argentina and Russia, while Moody’s faced failure in the crisis of Russia but not in the crisis of Argentina. This definition of failure depicts that there was less prevalence of rating failures between the years 1999 and 2002 in comparison with that of 1997 and 1998 (Elayan et al., 2007).