该产品的市场供给曲线是由该产品的供给发展而来，并对其定价进行预测。这种产品的供应量增加了，因此预计价格会下降。产品的供给曲线表示产品的可用性。这也是基于供应的价格，支付给员工的工资，涉及生产的资本成本和需要支付的税收(Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016)。需求和供给之间的动态关系决定了产品的市场价格。
基于这一基本关系，当产品需求的数量与基于现行市场定价的供给量相等时，假定市场已经达到均衡。这就是产品的市场均衡。当产品需求发生变化时，产品的市场均衡也随之发生变化。这是这个过程的一个简单启发。有许多复杂的变量决定产品的实际价格。由于产品的均衡是以需求曲线和供给曲线的交点为标志的，所以产品的定价会发生变化。这已经体现在该产品2.9%的降价上。市场均衡是以供给曲线和需求曲线之间的动态关系为基础的。产品的需求没有变化，保持不变(Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016)。另一方面，供应链的增加降低了产品的价格，因为这两个变量是成反比的。
美国经济中的可可价格是以抽象形式进行交易的。它是根据产品在市场上的未来储量进行交易的。这些商品被认为是非常不稳定的商品。可可工厂的生产者通常在发展中国家。巧克力制造商通常试图以较低的价格获得产品。如果他们基于需求会增加的基础上进行商品交易，交易者将支付高于产品市场价格的价格。可可市场高度依赖该产品未来的储量。这些降价可能意味着降低供应商的价格，并增加巧克力行业的利益。这种降价可能对该国的巧克力制造商有利。由于大宗商品的定价基于发展中国家的供应，这对美国经济来说是个好消息(Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016)。
这篇文章似乎解决了这些问题的核心，并且令人满意。很明显，由于该产品未来储备的增加，市场均衡将发生变化。人们已经意识到，在需求保持不变的情况下，产品的产量会更高，因此产品的降价是相当明显的(Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016)。这种对产品的需求也会随着季节功能和节假日的增加而增加。因此，未来将会有一种动态的变化，但到目前为止，预计需求曲线仍将停滞不前。
Demand curve mandates that the people make purchase decision based on the pricing of the product, income of the buyer, similar products from different brands prevailing in the market, consumer individual requirement and the future trends of the market. These factors contribute towards the demand of a product. The demand of a product is complex heuristics between the individual demand and the market demands of a product. The market demand curve is the relationship between the demand quantity of the product and the price of the products. This is expected to remain the same.
The market supply curve of the product is the supply developed by the product and the pricing of the predict. There has been increase in the supply of the product and hence the price is expected to reduce. The supply curve of a product states the availability of the product. This is again based on the price of the supplies, wages paid to the employee, capital costs involved in production and the taxes that need to be paid (Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016). The dynamic relationship between the demand and supply determines the market price of the product.
Based on this fundamental relationship, when the quantity of a product demand becomes equal to the quantity supplied based on the prevailing market pricing, it is assumed that the market has reached equilibrium. This is known as the Market equilibrium of a product. When there is change in the demand of a product, then the market equilibrium of the product changes. This is a simple heuristics of the process. There are many complex variables that determine the actual price of the product. Since the equilibrium of the product is marked by the intersection of the demand and the supply curve, the pricing of the product will change. This has been seen in the 2.9% price decline of the product. Market equilibrium is based on the dynamic relationship between the supply curve and the demand curve. There is no change in the demand of the product and they remain the same (Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016). On the other hand, the increase in supply chain decreases the price of the product as these two variables are inversely proportional to each other.
Cocoa price in the US economy is traded in its abstract form. It has been traded based on the future reserves of the product in the market. These commodities are considered to be very volatile commodity. The producers of the cocoa plant are usually in developing nations. The chocolate manufactures typically try to gain the product on lower pricing. If they trade on the commodity on the bases that there would be increase in demand, the traders will pay more than the market price of the product. The cocoa market is highly dependent on the future reserves of the product. These reduced prices could mean lowering of the prices for the supplier and increased benefits for the chocolate industry. This reduced pricing will probably be good for the chocolate manufacturers of the country. Since the commodity is priced based on the developing nations supplies, it is positive news for the US economy (Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016).
This article seems to address the core of the issues and is found to be agreeable. It is quite clear that the market equilibrium will be shifted owing to the increase in future reserves of the product. It has been perceived that the product will be produced higher and hence the reduced prices for the product when the demand remains unchanged is quite clear (Bohl, Gross & Souza, 2016). This demand for the product will also increase in the seasonal functions and holidays. Owing to this, there will be a dynamic change in the future but as of now the demand curve is expected to remain stagnant.