论文代写：媒体和民族主义之间的联系
在过去的几十年里,媒体和民族主义之间的联系已经迅速发展的,而一个无关紧要的话题的一个主要和知名媒体和通信研究领域的问题。通信技术的发展,特别是卫星电视和万维网,刺激了希望民族国家和国家的稳定疲软的连接,形成一个相互关联、统一全球社区。然而,民族国家,国家和民族主义还活着,尽管(也许)因为激烈的通信流绕过国家边界和具有挑战性的国家组织从上面和下面的东西。媒体和交流学者缺乏占明显的民族主义情绪的传播,更明确地对媒体和通讯的作用的一些变化。同样的(1995)声称是“平庸的民族主义”概念描述了媒体的角色塑造和建设的民族主义。Gerbner(1964)支持这种观点,记者作为某些群体的成员是不可避免的与国家成员,它们共享相同的文化价值观和信仰也会影响他们的新闻工作。甘斯(1979)在他的研究中发现,种族优越感的覆盖大多数出现在报道,当美国参与某些国际问题。布鲁克斯(1999)也认为可能。媒体”反映了民族主义的主题在危机情况下,威胁国家利益或国家安全”(21页)。
论文代写：媒体和民族主义之间的联系
Over the last few decades, the link between media and nationalism has quickly developed from being rather an insignificant topic to one of the main and prominent issues in the field of media and communication studies. Developments in communication technology, particularly the satellite television and the World Wide Web, have fuelled hopes about the steady weakening of nation-states and national connection and the formation of an interconnected and unified worldwide community. Nevertheless, nation-states, nations, and nationalism are alive and despite (perhaps) because of the intense communication flow circumventing the national borders and challenging the national organization of things both from above and from below. Media and communication scholars are ill-equipped to account for the propagation of overt nationalist sentiments, and more explicitly for the role of media and communications in some of the changes. Billig’s (1995) claimed notion is that “banal nationalism” describes the role of the media in the shaping and construction of nationalism. Gerbner (1964) supported this argument that journalists who as members of certain in-group are unavoidable share same cultural values and beliefs with the national members—which also could influence their journalistic work. Gans (1979) found in his research that ethnocentric coverage are most present in coverage that when U.S. involved in certain international issues. Brooks (1999) also argued that likely U.S media “reflect nationalist themes in crisis situations in which there is a perceived threat to national interests or national security” (p.21).
