论文代写：诗歌评判
作者利用西奥多·罗瑟克的诗歌和冲突的观点，在学生和教授之间产生了不同的观点。教授把这首诗看作是一位勤劳的中产阶级父亲，他也有时间和孩子们在一起，时间是如此珍贵，以至于小男孩把它等同于死亡。学生们觉得这首诗反映了一个酗酒成性的父亲。这里的文化改变了人们对事物的看法。这首诗的创作时间也远不如现在，孩子们认为父母的教养方式更积极，中产阶级的价值观反映了更敏感的父亲。在文化适应中，学生们会将自己的价值观内化到这样的程度，以至于他们把一切都看得很严格。在实际生活中，这使得他们更难解决问题。思维的僵化不支持从不同的角度思考。二分类的世界对个人来说没有意义，因为他们根深蒂固的假设和批判性的思考者受到挑战。要摆脱这些挑战，唯一的方法就是质疑文化和文化如何影响一个人的思想。文化神话必须受到质疑，必须对其进行分析，另一方面，矛盾的神话也不能被否定，但至少要被考虑。
论文代写：诗歌评判
caused different opinions in a class between students and the Professor. The Professor viewed the poem as being that of a hardworking middle class father who also found time to spend with his kids and the time was so precious that the small boy equates it to hanging on like death. The students felt the poem reflects a father with an alcoholic abuse problem. Culture here changes how people perceive things. The time, in which the poem was written is also far removed as in current times, children see parenting in a more positive style with middle class values reflecting more sensitive fathers. In acculturation, the students would have internalized values to such an extent that they see everything rigidly. In practical life this makes it more difficult for them to work out problems. The rigidity of thinking does not support thinking from different perspectives. The world of dichotomies does not make sense to the individual because their ingrained assumptions and herein critical thinkers are challenged. The only way to come out of these challenges is to question culture and the dominated thinking that how culture imparts to one. Cultural myths have to be questioned and have to be made open to analysis and on the other hand, contradictory myths must also not be rejected but must at least to be considered.
