论文代写：数学
奎因认为数学句子和定理都是存在论地致力于数学对象。换句话说,对于一个句子是正确的和可靠的它需要的数学对象的变量的范围,它将使用证明这句话(奎因,1969)。奎因进一步补充说,单一的术语和一阶量词必须给予承诺,所有对象用作变量的过程中证明的可靠性将需要确定范围。巴(2008)已确定并声明,对于一个句子是正确的在这个世界上,只有一些而不是所有对象需要范围的量词。这一论点涉及本体论承诺没有在其他参数。它也可以指出一阶和奇异项数字不只是给上升到本体论承诺本身。数字作为自然存在的,所谓的发明来自这些数字已经存在的数学领域的进一步发展藏而不被发现。需要有一个理论的评估可以评估的真实性理论要求我们相信存在的实体的集合。论证了奎因是弱的解释达到其预期的结果,并没有提供太多的可靠性可以回答所有的反索赔。
论文代写：数学
Quine argues that all the mathematical sentences and theorems are ontologically committed to mathematical objects. In other words, for a sentence A to be true and be reliable it requires the mathematical objects to be in the range of the variables that it will use to prove the sentence A (Quine, 1969). Quine further adds that the singular terms and first-order quantifiers must be ontologically committed and that all the objects used as variables in the process of the proving of its reliability will be needed to be in the range identified. Rayo (2008) has identified and stated that for a sentence to be true in this world, only some and not all objects needs to be in the range of the quantifiers. This single argument involves the ontological commitment which was absent in the case of other arguments. It could also be noted that the first-order and singular term numbers do not simply give rise to ontological commitment by itself. The numbers exist as natural ones and the so called inventions from those numbers have been the further development of the already existing mathematical realm which was hidden and not discovered. There needs to be a theory of assessment which can assess that the truthfulness of a theory commits us to believe the existence of a collection of entities. The argument presented by Quine is weak in its explanation to reach its intended outcome, and does not provide much reliability that could answer all counter claims.
