论文代写:亚里士多德的政治主张

论文代写:亚里士多德的政治主张

亚里士多德的政治主张为活跃的公民和政治领袖提供了全面的指导。对亚里士多德政治观点的两卷研究被称为第二卷和尼各马可伦理学。本文还描述了亚里士多德的政治自然主义。根据亚里士多德的说法,人类是政治动物,政治理论的存在是为了向个体公民提供关于政治的重要信息(Soni, 2010)。本个案研究阐述了亚里士多德所重视的限制政治平等的关键概念。亚里士多德所展示的自然奴隶参与工具推理,通过工具推理可以学习简单的手艺。亚里士多德在第三卷中讨论了公民身份的本质,以及三种偏离和正确的宪法之间的区别。在第三卷中,他还对宪法进行了六重分类。对第三卷的研究介绍了好的和坏的政治制度。在第一卷中,公民的伦理和政治的研究被讨论。

论文代写:亚里士多德的政治主张

亚里士多德理论的核心概念显示了政治平等的局限性。通过这次讨论,我们知道在第一卷中,亚里士多德定义了“公民”这个词可以通过分享思想和决定来体现(亚里士多德,2016)。一些证据表明了亚里士多德所讨论的公民正义的令人信服的理由。通过《尼各马可伦理学》,他证明了这种伦理对于由不平等的权力组成的平等的人来说是不公平的。为了遵守正义,不需要政治上的平等。亚里斯多德的推理证明了美德的乐观主义、道德和实践方法。在第三卷中,很少有令人信服的因素被讨论,像王权或君主的规则,这涉及到一个城市的统治的一个关于公民的优势。亚里斯多德以令人信服的因素的形式确立的统治被认定为暴政。贵族统治的规则表明,少数优秀和善良的公民的裁决主要集中在这种情况下。

论文代写:亚里士多德的政治主张

The political claims of Aristotle provide the comprehensive guide to the active citizens and the political leaders. The two-volume study of political opinions of Aristotle is known as the second volume and the Nicomachean Ethics. The political naturalism of Aristotle is also described in this essay. According to the claim of Aristotle, the human beings are political animals and the political theories are existed for providing significant information about the politics to the individual citizens (Soni, 2010). This case study elaborates the key concept of limitation of political equality valued by Aristotle. The natural slaves shown by Aristotle are involved in instrumental reasoning through which simple craft skills can be learned. The nature of citizenship and the differentiation between three deviant and correct constitutions are discussed by Aristotle in Book III. In Book III, he also approaches the six-fold taxonomy of the constitutions. The good and bad political systems are introduced by the study of the Book III. In Book I, the ethics of citizens and the study of politics are conversed.

论文代写:亚里士多德的政治主张

The key concept of Aristotle’s theories shows the limitation of political equality. Through this discussion, it is known that in Book I, Aristotle defines that the term citizen can be demonstrated by sharing of thoughts and decisions (Aristotle, 2016). Some evidence suggests the convincing reasons for the justice of the citizen as discussed by Aristotle. Through the Nicomachean Ethics, he showed that this ethics could be unfair for equal people to comprise of unequal power. To comply with justice, the political equality is not required. The optimism, morality of virtue and the practical approaches of this are shown by the reasoning of the Aristotle. In Book III, few convincing factors are discussed like the kingship or the monarchic rules, which involved the rule of a city by an advantage concerning about the citizens. The rule by one established by Aristotle in the form of the convincing factors is identified as the tyranny. The aristocracy rules are indicating the situation by which the rulings of few best and virtuous citizens are mainly focused.