从制度理论的社会角度，可以分析这个问题。社会观点指出，在这方面，机构性行为者，特别是在这方面的所有者，由于网络内部的相互作用，被授权采取某种方式行动(Fuenfschilling & Truffer,2014)。因此，可以指出，卡塔尔的问题是由国际足联在与卡塔尔的国家和政府机构互动时所假定的权威权利所驱动的。尽管国际足联声称，它一直在与卡塔尔机构谈判，以解决围绕在该国的工作的问题，但没有真正的发展(Rojek,2014)。因此，国际足联在一开始就能注意到雇佣移民工人的规则和规范的方式。因此，通过从制度理论的社会角度分析整个问题，可以很容易地指出国际足联最近的诉讼过程中缺乏管理行动。在考虑卡塔尔的问题、欺诈和贿赂以及对移徙工人的剥削时，应当注意到管理者和领导人的决定。虽然缺乏治理框架，但却对贿赂问题产生了影响，但对移徙工人没有任何就业政策导致了在卡塔尔工作的人的情况。因此，这两个问题都指向了国际足联管理机构和领导人的错误。
From the social perspective in institutional theory, this issue can be analysed. The social perspective notes that the institutional actors notably the owners in this regard are empowered to act in certain ways because of the interactions within the networks (Fuenfschilling & Truffer, 2014). Therefore, it can be pointed out that the issues in Qatar are motivated by the authoritative entitlement that FIFA had assumed while interacting with the state and government bodies in Qatar. While FIFA had claimed that it has been in talks with the Qatar agencies to address the issues surrounding the labours in the country, no actual development has been noted (Rojek, 2014). As such, the ways in which the rules and norms of employing migrant workers could have been noted by FIFA at the very start. Therefore, by analysing the whole issue from the social perspective of institutional theory, it can be readily pointed out the lacks in management actions that have shaped FIFA’s recent proceedings. In considering the issues, the fraud and bribery and the exploitation of the migrant workers in Qatar, the decisions of managers and leaders should be noted. While lacks in governance frameworks have been noted to have impacted the bribery issue, the absence of any employment policy for migrant workers has led to the condition of those working in Qatar. Both the issues therefore, point to the faults of management body and leaders of FIFA.