论文代写:消费者保护

论文代写:消费者保护

根据1993年“消费者保证法”第1部分,第6节确保“质量合格的保证”。在本节中,向顾客保证的商品必须具有可接受的质量。如果货物不符合向客户保证的保证,则客户可以对供应商或制造商(在这种情况下是Layabout)有权利进行补救。现在商品或服务的可接受质量是适用于所有商品或服务使用目的的地方。第7节在外观,表面光洁度,缺陷,安全性,耐用性,商品性质,价格和包装等方面提供了所需要的条款。现在商品的外观并不像人们期望的那样。由于地毯的某些部分没有正确固定在地板上,因此没有正确完成。没有不安全的地毯可能会导致里奇潜在的不安全状况。由于不安全的地毯,里奇可能会倒下,这是对Layabout服务和产品质量的破坏。

论文代写:消费者保护
现在与其他产品和服务一样,里奇可以选择致电Layabout并拒收货物并要求退款。该法第22条和第23条规定了这种拒绝所需的条款。现在里奇可以打电话来拒绝这件商品,而且这笔款项有权把这笔钱寄回莱亚布特。但是,第22条规定,如果由于货物的尺寸,高度或重量等原因造成所涉货物无法运输而消费者没有大量费用,供应商应收集货物。因此,由于他们违反质量保证而放弃Ritchie将不负责收集货物。根据第23条,消费者Ritchie将不会选择退款或更换。除了消费者提供的任何其他考虑因素拒绝商品外,消费者还可以选择向他支付退款金额。退款是指支付给消费者的现金价值,消费者可以根据具体情况获得其他产品。但是,这又会受到消费者的意见。因此,Ritchie不能被Layabout强迫接受另一个地毯或他们的服务作为以前产品的补偿。

论文代写:消费者保护

Under Part 1 of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, section 6 assures the “Guarantee as to acceptable quality”. Under this section, the goods guaranteed to a customer must be of acceptable quality. Where the goods are not complying with the guarantee assured to customer, then the customer can have been right of redress against supplier or manufacturer, who in this case is Layabout. Now acceptable quality as defined for the goods or service, is where they are fit for all the purposes for which goods or service are used. Section 7 gives the provisions as needed in terms of appearance, finish, defects, safety, durability, the nature of goods, price and packaging etc. Now the goods are not of proper appearance as one would expect. It is not finished properly as some sections of the carpet was not secured to the floor properly. Not an unsecured carpet could lead to a potentially unsafe condition for Ritchie. Ritchie could fall because of the unsafe carpet and this is a breach of quality of services and products from Layabout.

论文代写:消费者保护
Now as with any other product and service, Ritchie will have the option to call Layabout and reject the goods and ask for a refund. Section 22 and 23 of the Act make the provisions needed for this rejection. Now Ritchie can call and reject the good, and the provision would be entitled to send the good back to Layabout. However, section 22 states that in such cases where the goods in question cannot be transported without significant cost to the consumer because of the size of the goods, or the height or the weight, then the supplier should collect the goods. Therefore, layabout because of their breach of guarantee for quality to Ritchie will not be obligated to collect the goods. Per section 23, the consumer Ritchie will not have the option of refund or replacement. The consumer can choose to have a refund amount paid out to him in addition to the rejection of goods for any other consideration that consumer has provided. A refund means a cash value to be paid out to the consumer and the consumer can obtain another product as the case might require. However, this again would be subject to consumer opinion. Therefore, Ritchie cannot be forced by Layabout to accept another carpeting or service from them as a compensation for the previous product.