英国essay代写:客户法律

英国essay代写:客户法律

这起案件涉及一家大型培训机构,该公司承认自己违反了客户法律,并要求偿还政府提供的培训贷款中的某些款项。该公司是Career Australia,已与澳大利亚竞争与客户委员会(ACCC)达成协议,将公司获得的任何类型的资金偿还给澳大利亚的政府。这是因为这些资金是通过易受伤害的学生通过伪造的申请而获得的。在12130个无用的注册被取消后,4430万美元已经偿还给政府(Bagshaw, 2016)。这包括这样一个事实,即学生报名已经完成,但他们实际上从来没有在研究中报名。从2013年起,澳大利亚职业教育机构从政府那里获得了1.9亿美元的贷款,这是一项由学生贷款计划(student scheme for loan at VET-FEE-HELP)提供的贷款。2013-2015年澳大利亚职业生涯以招生为主。这些学生的注册人数约为4万人,其中一半以上是非官方注册的。这导致他们签约欠学生的债。

英国essay代写:客户法律

在ACCC的一份声明中,该组织承认,该组织的某些代理人挨家挨户推销产品的行为,导致该公司作出虚假陈述,该公司的行为是不合理的(Parker, 2004)。这包括对课程不收费、帮助人们找到工作以及提供免费的i -pad等任何形式的激励的虚假陈述。这进一步涉及允许来自亚拉巴一个偏远土著社区的80名顾客。这是因为他们希望参与课程注册,并招致债务,而不顾改变这些债务将产生的观点。

这种行为影响了澳大利亚境内某些脆弱的客户群体和最弱势的群体。

英国essay代写:客户法律

The case is about a major training provider who admitted that it broke the law of customers and required paying back certain millions that it received within the loans for government backed-up training. The firm is Career Australia which has come under agreement with the ACCC (Australian competition and customer commission) for repaying to the government of Australia any type of fund that the company obtained. This was because the funds were obtained through vulnerable students being signed up through use of falsified claims. 44.3 million dollars has been repaid to government after 12130 useless enrolments were cancelled out (Bagshaw, 2016). This was inclusive of the fact that students’ signing up was done but they actually never took towards enrolling within the study. 190 million dollars were received by Careers Australia from government from the year 2013 under the student scheme for loan at VET-FEE-HELP that extended the loans for HECS style to study the courses in diploma. Careers Australia from the period of 2013-2015 indulged in enrolling up students. These students were enrolled at approximately 40000 numbers and enrolled unofficially over half of this number. This led in signing them towards the debts of students.

英国essay代写:客户法律

Within an ACCC statement, the organization was under admittance to the fact that by the behaviour of certain of its agents who went from door to door selling, false representations were made by the company and the company got engaged within conduct of unconscionable nature (Parker, 2004). This was inclusive of misrepresentation that the courses did not involve fees, helped people in finding their jobs and offered any form of inducements such as I-pads that are free. This further involved allowing 80 customers from a remote community of Aboriginals within Yarrabah. This was because they wished to have involvement in course enrolment and incur the debts disregard altering these to the perspective that debt would be incurred.

Such a conduct influenced certain of the vulnerable customer groups and the most disadvantaged groups within Australia.