英国广告学论文代写:全球储蓄过剩

英国广告学论文代写:全球储蓄过剩

经济衰退和影响不是一次性事件的结果,而是许多原因的综合影响,如全球利率停滞、经济停滞造成的不安全以及住房危机。在这一背景下,基于已经提出的论点,经济问题不断深化的关键原因是中国。有人说,在中国经济增长的情况下,全球储蓄出现了如此程度的过剩,这反过来又导致了低利率的局面。低利率是导致房地产泡沫的原因。因此,根据格林斯潘的回应,他认为中国是这一切发生的主要原因,美联储只控制着美国的短期利率。

英国广告学论文代写:全球储蓄过剩

现在,全球储蓄过剩假说似乎表明,经济螺旋式下降是由储蓄超过投资造成的。现在,传统的不平衡被认为是由国家储蓄和投资金额的差异造成的。通常,储蓄有三种形式,即家庭部门、商业部门和政府部门。现在考虑到其他国家的储蓄是问题的根源,美国的过度消费是不能被完全接受的。现在,尽管有关中国经济是一个高储蓄经济体、似乎导致了出口失衡的说法有一定道理,但也必须考虑法定货币。法定货币是合法投标的货币,可能没有实物商品作为后盾。中国经济也在增长,2009年国内生产总值(GDP)增长46%,投资机会也很诱人。因此,大部分储蓄将被这些机会所吸收,不能说中国人储蓄过剩。这是在研究工作中提出的基本论点。

英国广告学论文代写:全球储蓄过剩

The economic recession and effects were not a consequence of once incident, but an integrated effect of many causes such as the global interest rate stagnation, the insecurity because of the economic stagnation, and the housing crises. In this context, based on the arguments that have been made, the key cause of the deepening economic issue was China. It was said that in the case of the Chinese growth, there was such a level of excesses in global savings and this in turn led to the situation of the interest rates being low. The low interest rates were what fueled the housing bubble situation. Therefore, according to Greenspan’s response, it was stated that China was the reason behind most of this happening and that the Fed only had control over short term rates in the United States.

英国广告学论文代写:全球储蓄过剩

Now the global savings Glut hypothesis seems to state that the economic down spiral was caused because of the savings exceeding investment. Now traditional imbalances were considered to be caused by means of difference in national level savings and the amount that was invested. Usually, there are three forms of sources for savings which are the household sector, the business sector and also the government sector. Now in order to consider that other countries’ saving is the root cause of problems, the United States’ over consuming cannot be accepted in its entirety. Now although there is some truth to the argument that the Chinese economy is a high saving economy and seems to have led to some imbalance in exports, considerations have to be made for fiat money as well. Fiat money is money that is legally tendered and might not have physical commodity to backup it. China also had a growing economy with GDP increase at 46 percent as recorded in 2009 and has attractive investment opportunities as well. Therefore, much of saving will be absorbed into these opportunities and it cannot really be said that Chinese were surplus saving. This is the basic argument made in the research work.