The idea behind education is that it enables the students to gain knowledge about different kinds of subjects and to instill healthy mind. It is to improve the quality of life. It is important to have appropriate education during the formative developmental stage of individuals. The curriculum taught to the students must be a curriculum that is appropriate and also well tested. It is imperative to understand that they control the future generation growth. The thesis statement that would be considered in this analysis is that the schools need a standard national curriculum.
The main reason for this approach is that there would be a uniform level of education. Learning of different contents would essentially be the same. Certain states would try to make them seem superior and be content with the subject to have the students choose elite colleges. This would put the other students in a stark disadvantage. By levelling the plain field all people would be given a fair shot. The tests considered are standardized test that is the same for all students. Hence it seems appropriate that people need to be given the same fair shot to gain admissions in to college.
In some schools to rise the state level score could lower the educational standard to see higher scores. In this the students in these states would be disadvantaged. They would be considered as students who have learnt less in this paradigm. This could make the students face the issues of not being smart even though they have the potential to compete in the national level.
The argument that is made against this national curriculum is that it could stifle growth and that the freedom of choice becomes limited. However, in this paradigm, the students are given the opportunity to consider different elective choices and they can choose extracurricular activities. Admissions are based on this paradigm. Hence by having individual curriculum it would cause more issues and learning disadvantages to students. Having a state level education does not really favor the students. They only give the bureaucrats more power to control the educational systems. Additionally, the testing of these curriculums also varies. This would cause confusion to all the people involved in the process.
Based on this it can be agreed that the states need to follow certain level of education till the school rather than states change different curriculum.