英国利兹音乐学院论文代写：执政党
有许多的原因,不同的人在回答这个问题为什么第三个政党从来没有成功的在美国总统选举。通常在这方面的一个原因是,传统上,这些政党出现从激进的思想家,由于沮丧的感觉,因此不支持这些政党更合理的思想家。同样的,另一个原因,通常是在回答问题,为什么第三个政党没有成功的总统选举是这些政党没有持久的领袖(啤酒和Stonecash,2006)。在这方面,通常是另一个原因是缺乏资源以及缺乏影响力和这些政党的重要支持者。因此,金融资源,同时有影响力的领导人和商业关系是非常重要的对于一个政党的成功在美国,尤其是在总统级别。此外,第三个政党改革党,自由主义者和宪法方遭受一个缺点由于联邦竞选财务法适用于双方谁能参加总统竞选辩论。同时,在这方面可以给的另一个原因是,第三个政党在美国更受媒体关注相比,两大政党(奥尔德里奇和罗德,2001)。
英国利兹音乐学院论文代写：执政党
There are a number of reasons that have been given by different people while answering that question why a third political party has never been successful in the US in presidential elections. One reason that is commonly given in this regard is the fact that traditionally, these political parties have emerged from the radical thinkers, as a result of a feeling of frustration and therefore these parties are not supported by the more reasonable thinkers. In the same way, one more reason that is generally given while answering the question that why a third political party has not been successful in the presidential elections is that these parties do not have a lasting leader (Brewer and Stonecash, 2006). Another reason that is generally given in this regard is the lack of resources as well as the lack of influential and significant supporters of these parties. Therefore, financial resources, influential leaders and at the same time business affiliations are very important for the success of a political party in the US, particularly at the presidential level. Moreover, the third political parties like the Reform Party, Libertarians and the Constitution Party suffered from a disadvantage due to the federal campaign finance laws that are applicable to the parties who can take part in presidential debates. At the same time, another reason that can be given in this regard is that third political parties in the US receive much less attention by the media as compared to the two major political parties (Aldrich and Rohde, 2001).
