英国论文reference格式:亚里士多德的政治概念

英国论文reference格式:亚里士多德的政治概念

在政治哲学中,亚里士多德的政治思想比现代哲学思想更受到哲学家的广泛接受。对于政治哲学来说,这些表达既包括政策的工作,也包括哲学的思想,而哲学思想并没有以工作的形式表现出来。对于政治家来说,它可以被定义为为了政治秩序而选择的高尚行为,而它为了广泛的占有和金钱的利益而占据了最政治的生活。按照亚里士多德的思想,政治美德以政治为代表,并在政治规则中得到实践。由于法律和司法行政既公平又不公平,司法被描述为属于两者之间的关系。综上所述,亚里士多德关于政治公正的言论在法律上是属于正义的,平等自然是符合法律的。这篇重要的文章突出了亚里士多德政治史的论点。城邦的主要目的是维持政治科学的适当任务和公民的幸福,而公民的幸福更倾向于提供体现在法律和宪法中的政治秩序。从认识论证的政治秩序入手,有助于形成正确的正义观,指导立法过程。城邦的公民将拥有公正的权利和与政治性质一致的权利。在亚里士多德的政治理论中,他为政治学说辩护,这些政治学说以政治原则的形式说明了人类政治存在的本质。争论的一致意见认为,政治理论是一个群体,在这个群体中,个人必须帮助另一个人过上健康的生活,以便实现自给自足。正义的政治宪法是法治和秩序标准的具体体现(Beiner, 2010)。亚里士多德将法律和秩序的政治问题视为一场争论,争论的焦点是,政治平等是否有权利或要求成为一个特定的公民,以及公民应该具有政治知识的法律的权利。亚里士多德重视关于公民个人权利的问题以及他们之间在传统权利和政治本质方面的差异。亚里斯多德强调权利和法律的公正,这些权利和法律的公正并不是用来为人权甚至是为《公约》作出贡献而审议的。亚里士多德的同意论证支持了一种政治正义理论,在这种理论中,政治家应该运用他们的讨论。亚里士多德在某种意义上承认个人权利的观点并不新鲜。亚里斯多德在谈到正义和权利时,不会提到某些团体。亚里士多德显然同意布拉德利的观点,即约阿希姆的自然正义理论为建立在人类本性基础上的权利提供了基础,而这些权利与传统权利是不同的。亚里斯多德对联邦法律和秩序的理解在政治中并不等同,因为在城邦中公民拥有的政治权利可能是自然的,没有政治预测。此外,亚里士多德的理论普遍地对待人权问题,亚里士多德的论点很容易识别出人类之间的政治或社会关系。

英国论文reference格式:亚里士多德的政治概念

In political philosophy, Aristotle’s ideas of Politics are broadly received by the philosophers than modern thinking of philosophy. For political philosophy, these expressions include work of the policy but also the thought of philosophy, which is not expressed in the form of the work. For the politician, it can be defined as the chosen noble acts for their sake of political order, while it takes up for the most political life in the interests of extensive possession and money. The political virtues are represented by the politics as per the thought of Aristotle, which is exercised in the rules of politics. The justice is depicted to be belonging to their relations with each other since laws and the administrations of justice are both fair and unfair. Summarizing the discussion, Aristotle’s remarks on political justice in according to the law are belonging to the justice and equality was naturally fitted for the law. The significant passage highlights the arguments of the political history of Aristotle. The main aim of a polis is to maintain the proper task of political science and the happiness of the citizens which is preferred to provide the political order embodied in laws and constitution. Proceeding from the understanding of the political order of arguments helps in the formation of the appropriate conception of justice to guide legislation process. The citizens of the polis will possess the rights of justice and claims which are in order of accordance with nature of politics. In the political theory of Aristotle defended the doctrines of politics which illustrate the nature of human beings politically existing in the form of political principles. The arguing agreement claims that the political theories are a community in which individuals must help another to lead a healthy life in order to attain self-sufficiency. A political constitution of justice is the particular embodiment of the standard rule of law and order (Beiner, 2010). Aristotle represents the political problem of law and order as a dispute, over the political equality that has just a right or claims to be a particular citizen and over the rights of laws in which the citizens should have the political knowledge. Aristotle gives importance the questions as regards the rights of individual citizens and differences between them in respect of traditional rights and merely nature of politics. Aristotle emphasized on the rights and the justices of law which is not deliberated to pay the contribution of human rights or even of the convention. Aristotelian agreeing argument supports a theory of political justice in which the politicians should employ their deliberations. The notion that Aristotle recognizes the rights of individuals in some sense is not new. Aristotle would speak of justice and rights without the reference to some community. Aristotle evidently agreed with Bradely’s claim that Joachim’s theory of natural justice provides a basis for rights founded on the nature of man in distinction from merely conventional rights. Aristotle’s senses of federal law and order are not equivalent in the politics because the rights of politics of a citizen possess in a polis may be natural without political predictions. Moreover, Aristotle’s theory treats the human rights universally, and the political or social relationships between human beings are easily identified by the arguments of Aristotle.