Currently the UOW social media policy is known to be generic. It has a number of technical jargons that the students use to communicate and send information. The social media policy recommendation for the University is found to change every 2 years. The UOW social media has a policy that they are compliant with the common laws and legislations. This is the basic rules of the social media policy. It is evident that the policy of the University is about the code of conduct of the people both online and in the offline media portals. In this system, the University can use few recommendations to address any plausible gaps in the services and in the technology
The policy of changing policy every 2 years is slow in the current times. The social media policy of the University can include more online analytics tools. This can include Google analytics, Facebook insights to name a few online analytic tools. It can use these tools to continually evaluate the online application or tool. They must shorten the policy that the university should adhere and change the laws based on these system (Doolan and Gilbert, 2017).
The evaluation of the social media initiatives are depended by the quality of the relationships between different stakeholders. A continual feedback about different school groups and social media groups affiliated to the University need to be collated. By using this end result as an online application or tool, the university can gain more insights of the current trends and practices which are adhered by the students and staff members.
The rules should be codified to inform the students and staff members of basic respect and ensure that they maintain a speech decorum while expressing their views to the public (Doolan and Gilbert, 2017).
It is mandatory to have a metrics to measure the success of the social media policy. The University must comprehend about different ways in which the social media policy is adhered. A number of more tools to monitor the conduct of people. Threatening, abusive languages must strictly reprimand to prevent future events.
There is a discussion of the Personal vs. Professional behaviour in the social media personal in the website. It mentions about the mandates on how people behave and interact with others. They must aware of different kinds of nuanced discussions in place. The practitioners should comprehend about the messages that are posted on the professional networks. The staff must mindful of the ways in which they are connected with the students (Doolan and Gilbert, 2017). They can not reveal or break any confidentiality. There must be clear relationship which should be fostered and maintained with the students in the social media.
It is mandatory to have an understanding of the assessments and interventions of the social media policy for the specific discipline in study. For example, the career counsellors of the University do not have the information about the mindset and offer psychiatric advice to the people.
Added to the general guidelines, it is imperative to have discussion of the ways in which the companies limit and understand the ethics.
The staff and the Teachers should be aware of their competence and make judgement based on the knowledge and facility of people in the social media.
An increase in the social participation for the altruistic activities in the community (Doolan and Gilbert, 2017). This would help the people who are involved in the process.