代写论文：国家腐败整治
另一个治理优势,单一政党制度介绍的形式遏制腐败。腐败是一种社会邪恶和次数最多的政策为了窗帘腐败以失败告终,因为多党制的结果在不同的个体来权力和腐败的连续性缩减。然而中国的一党制度导致了腐败规模更先进的处理。在这里看到,相比邻近国家像印度和俄罗斯这样的国家分享相似的意识形态被认为面临腐败,而中国已经设法降低其腐败率有效地增加其经济繁荣(《中国日报》,2010年)。一个更负责任的政府是这些好处背后的原因。在大多数民主社会,国家通常是剩下一组固定的官员,工作承诺当选的条款和术语中他们必须推动政策,还应该确保他们在立法工作。这提供了他们许多约束和官方只会做什么是可控的,考虑到时间,个人的能力可能不被使用,和在某些情况下,个人不可能占用多的责任,他们在做什么在未来一段时间内他们无论如何将重新分配。然而在中国,一党制度确保了个人责任(《中国日报》,2010年)。他们将负责行动和有一个主要官员问责制已逐渐改善随着时间的推移,员工和官方能力提高。随着时间的推移,它可能为中国建立一个员工管理系统和改进系统的官员类似于企业为他们的公司做些什么。个人训练,以及改进招聘工作实践使人训练有素的治理结构。一端中国官员选拔制度比西方多党体系将给个人偏好基于支持地方政党(布雷,2005)。中国系统没有任何这样的偏好和民族主义议程总是保存在最前列。
代写论文：国家腐败整治
Yet another governance advantage that the single party system introduces is in the form of containment of corruption. Corruption is a social evil and most times the policies in order to curtain corruption fails because of the multiparty system that results in different individuals coming to power and continuity in corruption curtailment is lost. However the single party system of China has led to handling of corruption on a more advanced scale. Here it is seen that compared to neighbouring nations like that of India and nations sharing similar ideologies like that of Russia are seen to have faced much corruption, whereas China has actually managed to bring down its corruption rates effectively increasing its economic prosperity (China Daily, 2010). A more responsible Government is the reason behind these benefits. In most democratic societies, the nations are usually left with a fixed set of officials, who work a promised elected terms and within the term they have to push for policies and should also ensure that they work within legislation. This offers them many constraints and the official will only do what is manageable by them given the time frame, the proficiency of the individual might not be put to much use, and in some cases the individual might not take up much accountability for what they are doing as within a certain time frame they would anyways be reassigned. However in China, the single party system ensures that the individual would take up responsibility (China Daily, 2010). They would be accountable for the actions and there is a Principal Officials Accountability System which has been gradually improved over time such that employee and official competency are improved. Over time it has been possible for China to build an employee management system and improvement system for its officials similar to what corporations do for their companies. Personal training is done, along with improved recruitment practices that enable the people working in the governance structure to be well trained. At one end the Chinese system of selection of officials are better than the western multiparty system which would give preferences to individuals based on their support for regional parties (Bray, 2005). The Chinese system does not have any such preferences and nationalistic agenda is always kept in the forefront.