论文代写：女权主义
上述摘录已经从“女权主义干预历史的艺术”,女子名鳕鱼的学术演讲。。在她的作品中,波洛克反对原始社会规范,男性优于女性的地位。是对的概念刻画男性优于女性在任何学术或社会纪律。波洛克认为,女人的研究不仅关注女性,与社区和信仰别人,这抓住男人的支配地位,在全球其他组合和调整机构的权威,尤其是从阶级和种族。与波洛克的相关性角度看女性研究的目的性现代历史学家凯伦概念化的原点和妇女研究的效用可能被放置。-哈格曼-什纳布掌管的钢筋混凝土她的观点在一个文学演讲题为《女权主义历史学家和性别理论:理论和方法论的介绍与显著的客座讲师。哈格曼根据的角度来看女性研究的目的性驻留在其恢复女性的生活从历史学家的过失。
论文代写：女权主义
The aforementioned excerpt has been extracted from ‘Feminist Interventions in the Histories of Art’ , a scholarly presentation by Griselda Pollock. . In her work, Pollock argues against the primitive social norms that position men as superior to women. It is against the notion of portraying masculinity as superior to femininity in any academic or social discipline. Pollock argues that studies of woman are not only concerned with women but with community and beliefs of others, this hold on to the domination position of men, within other combined and adjusting establishments of authority worldwide, particular those from class and race.In relevance with Pollock’s perspective on the purposefulness of women’s studies modern historian Karen Hagemann’s conceptualization of the origin and utility of women’s studies may be placed. Hagemann concreted her view in a literary presentation titled ‘Feminist and Gender Theory for Historians: A Theoretical and Methodological Introduction’ in association with notable guest lecturers. According to Hagemann’s perspective on the purposefulness of women’s studies resides in its recovering women’s lives from the negligence of historians.
