论文代写：大学资助资金
以上数据清楚地表明总资助水平与大学排名之间的高度相关性。顶尖大学享有丰富的政府补助和私人投资，使他们能够投资于基础设施，员工和设备，这些都提高了他们的竞争力。然而，地区性大学的经费要少得多 – 东北大学47亿日元仅仅是清华大学230亿日元的20％。辽宁大学的资金更低，为22亿日元，不出所料，排名低于资金较高者。从顶尖大学到东北大学到辽宁大学，我们看到一个明显的趋势，即资金水平越低，排名越低。分析排名与资助之间的相关系数，系数为77％，证实资金与大学排名密切相关。
论文代写：大学资助资金
除政府资助外，其他因素也影响大学的收入。高排名的大学获得额外的资源作为企业赠款，这是从私营公司/组织获得的赠款，用于代表他们进行研究。清华大学获得的企业补助金额是东北大学的3.4倍，是辽宁大学的53倍。能够获得企业补助意味着可以进行更多的研究，高度熟练的教师将被吸引到大学，更多的公共资金可以转向改善教育，而不是花在研究上。辽宁大学在这方面的表现很差，通过与工业建立积极的关系来增加企业赠款将有助于增加其资金并提高其形象。这部分原因是由于其科学期刊出版物数量少得多，这表明其开展研究的能力可能不如东北大学那样具有吸引力。来自中国310所大学的企业补助金相关系数为54％，表明这两个因素密切相关。
论文代写：大学资助资金
The data above clearly indicates a high correlation between total funding level and university ranking. Top universities enjoy abundant government grants as well as private investment, enabling them to invest in infrastructure, staff, and equipment, which all enhance their competitiveness. Regional universities, however, have much less funding – ¥4.7bn for Northeastern University is merely 20% of the ¥23.3bn available to Tsinghua University. Liaoning University, with even lower funding at ¥2.2bn, unsurprisingly ranks lower than those with higher funding. From top universities to Northeastern University to Liaoning University, we see a clear trend that the lower the funding level, the lower the ranking is. Analyzing the correlation coefficient between Ranking and Funding, the coefficient is 77%, confirming how closely related funding is to the ranking of a university.
论文代写：大学资助资金
In addition to government funding, other factors also affect a university’s income. Highly ranked universities receive additional resources as enterprise grants, which are grants obtained from private companies/organizations to research on their behalf. The value of enterprise grants received by Tsinghua University is 3.4 times that of Northeastern University, which is then 53 times that of Liaoning University. Being able to obtain enterprise grants means that more research can be conducted, highly skilled teaching staff will be attracted to the university, and more public funding can be redirected to improving education instead of spending in research. Liaoning University performed very poorly in this area and increasing its enterprise grants by building active relationships with industries will help it boost its funding and raise its profile. This is partly explained by its much lower volume of scientific journal publications, which indicates that its ability to conduct research may not be as attractive as that of Northeastern University. The correlation coefficient between enterprise grants from analyzing 310 universities in China is 54%, indicating that these two factors are closely correlated.