代写论文：动物保护
以蔑视和完全漠视生命的基本权利来对待动物是人类非理性的一个缩影，因为当动物违背自己的意愿而被杀害时，这显然是对弱者使用武力的标志。这一点很明显的是，动物在被攻击时遭到了攻击，而这本身就是对人类不道德行为的一个严重案例。以同样的漠视对待其他人类是不道德的，因为它是杀死了理性的动物。福克斯和沃德(2008)在他们的研究中发现，参与者们愿意将他们的饮食限制在蔬菜上。他们也愿意限制他们在动物饮食方面的放纵，因为随之而来的环境破坏，以及兽医对动物治疗的需求增加。这表明，当人类意识到动物的痛苦时，它们的情绪就足以避免杀死它们而吃掉它们。因此，在深思熟虑和内部化的时候，就会让人意识到其他动物的痛苦。然而，意识到动物的痛苦和痛苦并不需要深思熟虑的讨论，这是很清楚和理性的。他们的行动和对杀戮力量的抵抗是显而易见的。因此，人类必须将饮食习惯限制在蔬菜上，这是一个意志的问题，因为动物在本质上是相似的，尽管在物种上是不同的。
代写论文：动物保护
Treating animals with disdain and utter disregard of their fundamental right to live are the epitome of the irrationality of humans, because when an animal is killed against its wish, it is clearly a sign of the use of force against a weaker animal. This is evident in the resistance provided by animals while being attacked for killing, and this makes itself a serious case of unethical behaviour against humans. Treating other humans with the same disregard would not be ethical, because it is to have killed a rational animal. Fox & Ward (2008) in their research found that participants were willing to restrict their diet to vegetables. They also were willing to restrict their indulgence in animal eating because of the environmental damage that comes with it, and the increased demand of animal treatment by veterinarians. This indicates that humans when made realised about the suffering of animals are emotional enough to avoiding killing them to eat them. Thus, suffering when contemplated and internalised makes one realise the pain of other animals. However, it is clear and rational enough that realising the pain and suffering of inexpressive animals does not require a deep contemplative discussion. It is evident by their actions and resistance to the force of killing. Hence, it is just a question of will that the humans must internalise to contemplate restricting their eating habits to vegetable, because animals are similar in nature, although different in species.
