现在考虑第三个主要问题，是皮埃尔和约翰之间的协议。皮埃尔和约翰在2017年2月进行了谈判。因此，有意向在谈判中明显地达成协议。皮埃尔和约翰还商定了一些条款，即约翰将为仓库订购的家具，包括仓库的家具储存设备，皮埃尔的任务是找到仓库。在协议结束的时候，约翰以3500美元的价格，以2500美元的价格，以2500美元的价格，向陶瓷有限公司(陶瓷Pty Ltd .)订购了一款价值2500美元的陶瓷Pty有限公司。他还订购了大约8000美元的书架。皮埃尔没有找到一个仓库，因为双方都同意停止厨房供应业务。现在生意已经不存在了，由约翰购买的发票现在到期应付。约翰要皮埃尔付一半的费用。在这种情况下，皮埃尔也有义务处理发票的情况，因为他没有履行他的公平份额，即使在他们决定终止合同的时候。约翰和皮埃尔已经交换了诺言，约翰将购买用品和设备，皮埃尔将安排仓库。现在，要么是在协议的结束，他们应该找到一些方法来偿还到期的发票，或者他们现在应该选择去做。皮埃尔必须找到一种方法，与约翰合作出售物资并付清发票，或者法院命令在这种情况下支付衡平法上的救济。在衡平法上的补救措施方面，法院可能命令皮埃尔履行合同规定的具体表现，如约翰所同意的那样。
Now consider the third main issue which is the agreement between Pierre and John. Pierre and John have had negotiations in February 2017. Therefore, there is an intention to enter agreement as evident in the negotiations. Pierre and John also have agreed upon some terms which are that John will order supplied for the warehouse including the furniture storage equipment for the warehouse and Pierre was tasked with finding the warehouse. True to his end of the agreement, John places orders on credit with Stainless Pty Ltd and Ceramic Pty Ltd for $2,500 and Ceramic Pty Ltd for $3,500. He has also placed an order for shelving for an amount of around $8,000. Pierre does not find a warehouse and then because of a disagreement both mutually agree to discontinue the kitchen supply business. Now as business is defunct, the invoices purchased by John are now due and payable. John wants Pierre to pay half the cost. In this situation, Pierre will also be obligated to handle the invoice situation because he did not perform to his fair share of agreement even until the time they decided to end the contract. John and Pierre had exchanged promises that John will buy supplies and equipment and Pierre would arrange for the warehouse. Now either in the closure of the agreement, they should have found some way to pay back the invoices due or they should elect to do it now. Pierre will have to either find a way to work with John to sell the supplies and pay off the invoice or might be ordered by the court to pay equitable remedies in this situation. In terms of equitable remedies, the court might order Pierre to meet specific performance (i.e.) requiring the performance of the contractual act as was agreed with John.