Many scientists and scholars took on the charge of scrutinizing this vital concept. Many researchers proposed their theories related to different aspect of human nature and environment that influence the destructiveness or constructiveness of an individual’s ability to apply creativity in his daily workout or to design something. Among these scientific researches, two counter concepts were found in mid 1700s. One was Adam Smith’s rational concept that creativity is a complete science and it has nothing to do with emotions and personal approaches. On the other hand, there was Jean Jacques who stated creativity to be an outcome of emotions. He called his theory Romanticism (Kaufman, 2010). This science vs feeling clash continued with their distinctive approaches and researches until 19th century. Eight years after Adam Smith’s demise, a pragmatic development followed by an Essay on Population by Malthus occurred. Malthus’s work offered two major advantages. One was that his work promoted nonphysical research in scientific society which benefited many scientists and researchers followed by him. The other chief benefit of his research was providing ground for Darwin’s work. Based on the key concepts given in Essay on Population, Darwin formulated a novel concept of adaption, diversity and natural selection.