加拿大代写:合作游戏和非合作游戏

加拿大代写:合作游戏和非合作游戏

联盟的自我利益在这里得到了高度的重视。合作模式的唯一问题是可能没有一个核心,因此它也不是唯一的。现在如果存在一个非唯一的核心,那么每个联盟代理的价值创造都无法准确地确定(Chatain 4)。这可能会挑战CGT模型的竞争本质。因此,这种形式的模型最好留给专业玩家。专家玩家将知道在实现最终结果的情况下应该做什么决定,不应该做什么决定。然而,当玩家对经济游戏相对陌生且彼此不甚了解时,他们最好选择一款非合作的游戏,因为这款游戏在结构上更有利于他们。他们不必做出灵活的决定,只要按照规则行事就行了。

加拿大代写:合作游戏和非合作游戏

在满足期望结果的战略决策方面,非合作博弈和合作博弈是非常有趣的。实际上,即使在日常生活中,也有一些不合作和合作的博弈谈判在进行,即使它不是完全处于经济环境中。例如,考虑一下在实际生活中,合作环境是大家都同意的。人们必须相互合作以实现特定的目标。例如,一个人必须和他的导师一起完成他们的论文。现在指导老师有义务指导学生,学生也有义务和指导老师一起工作。现在假设,承诺是合同,当学生和导师合作完成学生论文并让他们毕业时。在这种合作中,有可能进行谈判。有时,学生甚至可能选择选择一个不同的顾问,如果需要的话。这取决于所需的结果。学生想要确保他们得到最好的结果导师想要确保学生能得到他们想要的。在这种情况下,他们的游戏行为可以被称为合作游戏。

加拿大代写:合作游戏和非合作游戏

Coalitional self-interests are given high preference here. The only problem with the cooperative model is that there might not be a core and it would not be unique as such. Now when there is a non-unique core, it follows that each of the coalitional agent’s value creation cannot be determined accurately (Chatain 4). This could challenge the competitive nature of the CGT model. This form of a model is hence best left to expert players. Expert players would know what decisions to make and what not to in the context of achieving an end outcome. However, where the players are relatively new to an economic game and do not know much about one another, it is better for them to choose a noncooperative game as this game reaps better benefits for them in its structure. They don’t have to make flexible decision making and just go ahead with following the rules (Chatain 4)

加拿大代写:合作游戏和非合作游戏

In terms of strategic decision making to meet a desired outcome, the non-cooperative and cooperative games are interesting. Practically speaking, even in everyday life, there are some noncooperative and cooperative game negotiations going on even if it is not fully in the economic context. For instance, consider how in practical life, the cooperative context is something that everybody agrees, too. People must work with one another to meet specific goals. For instance, a person must work with their advisor to complete their thesis or dissertation. Now the advisor has a commitment to guide the student, and the student has a commitment to work with the advisor. Now assuming, the commitment is a contract, when working together the student and the advisor cooperate to complete student thesis and have them graduate. In this cooperation, there would be negotiations possible. Sometimes, student might even opt to choose a different advisor if need be. This depends on the needed outcome. Student wants to make sure they get the best possible outcome and advisor wants to make sure student can get what they want. Now in this context, their game play behavior can be called as a cooperative game.