美国田纳西大学论文代写:影响经济增长的因素

美国田纳西大学论文代写:影响经济增长的因素

印度的上述模型表明,无论是政府在教育方面的支出,还是人均GDP,在统计上都不显著。根据文献综述,这意味着印度的教育水平仍然很低,远远低于门槛。结果,尽管有政府支出,劳动力仍然普遍未受教育或文盲。换句话说,劳动力没有意识到教育的重要性,或者在短期内无法从教育中获益。这就是为什么该模型没有显示出政府教育支出与经济增长之间有任何统计上的显著关系。同样,印度还没有达到人均国内总产值的门槛,因为它与经济增长的关系并不大。排放系数的符号为负,这是意料之中的。

美国田纳西大学论文代写:影响经济增长的因素

另一方面,加拿大的模式提供了非常不同的结果。而在印度,人均GDP的对数的平方并没有显示出对模型有任何显著的贡献,它的移除实际上增加了模型的调整R2,而在加拿大,正好相反。平方项的加入实际上大大增加了模型的解释力。人均GDP系数为正,平方项系数为负。这一点得到了文献的支持。然而,加拿大的排放在模型中具有正显著的系数。这是因为加拿大的经济增长与其二氧化碳排放量之间的相关性在统计上与零相差不大。然而,中国的排放量相当低,远低于印度。因此,这个国家的人民对该国排放量的小幅飙升有了更强的容忍度。另外,加拿大增加排放的边际成本远低于印度。这就是为什么印度模式的排放系数是负的,而加拿大模式的排放系数是负的。

美国田纳西大学论文代写:影响经济增长的因素

The above model of India shows that neither government’s spending on education nor per capita GDP is statistically significant. Based on literature review, it implies that level of education in India is still very low, well below the threshold. As a result, despite government spending, the labour force remains widely uneducated or illiterate. In other words, the labour force does not realise the importance of education or is unable to derive benefits from education in the short run. This is why the model does not show any statistically significant relation between government spending on education and economic growth. Similarly, the threshold of per capita GDP is not yet reached for India because of which its relation with economic growth is not significant. The sign of emissions coefficient is negative which is as expected.

美国田纳西大学论文代写:影响经济增长的因素

The model of Canada on the other hand offers very different results. While in the case of India, the square of log of per capita GDP did not show any significant contribution to the model and its removal actually increased the adjusted R2 of the model, in case of Canada it was exactly opposite. The addition of the squared term actually increased the explanatory power of the model significantly. GDP per capita has positive coefficient while its square term has negative coefficient. This is supported by literature. However, emission has a positive & significant coefficient in the model for Canada. This is because the correlation between the economic growth of Canada and its CO2 emissions is not statistically different from zero. However, the emissions in the country are quite low, much lower than India. As a result the people of the country have a stronger tolerance for small surge in the emissions of the country. Alternatively, the marginal cost of increased emissions in Canada is much lower than that of India. This is why the emissions coefficient of Indian model is negative while that of Canada is negative.