本文主要讲述的是宪法和联邦政府的冲突，由于联邦党人反对这一意识形态，宪法遭到了强烈的反对。这些团体反对批准宪法。他们表示，联邦制安排将赋予联邦政府更多权力。他们的理念是，这将增加中央政府的腐败(丘奇，2014年，第17页)。有一种观点认为，如果政府最终屈服于暴政，美国自由的核心价值观将受到威胁。总统的权力在这个概念中非常强大。政府的财政权威受到质疑。人们担心这将导致不必要的开支和沉重的税收。反联邦主义者害怕在这个体系中给一个人更多的权力。本篇英国管理学论文代写文章由英国论文通AssignmentPass辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
There was strong opposition to Constitution as federalist was against this ideology. These groups opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They stated that the federalism arrangement would give Federal government more power. They operated on the ideology that these would increase plausible corruption in the central government (Church, 2014, p. 17). There was a view that the core values of American Freedom would be threatened if the government would eventually come under the tyrannical rile. President Powers were very strong in this notion. Fiscal authority of the government was questioned. The people feared that this would lead to unwanted spending and in oppressive taxes. Anti-federalist feared the implication of giving a single person more powers in this system.
Constitution had created more wholesome government and a sense of nation. It laid the foundation of national identity. There was importance given to ensure the safety and security of the people. It is evident that the Anti-federalist groups feared for a tyrannical government to come into power. They feared that President would make rules that could be corrupt. However, a more decentralized approach such as the ones mentioned in the Articles of Confederation would be beneficial in some instances. Ultimately the constitution and the federal government would work only if the President is qualified and honest. Reducing the powers of the President in the constitution would be a safer option to prevent tyrannical individuals from gaining much power.
The Constitution is a powerful analogy that has led to the formation of American national identity. The three branches of government were clear and the financial flow was established in the constitution. However, Articles of Confederation focused on the powers of the state and was more decentralized. The positives in the Constitution over weigh the Articles, there is a possibility that a tyrannical leader who is corrupt to gain power in the state. This is an obvious disadvantage in constitution. To conclude, these are the functional differences between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation.
如果需要英国论文代写，就来我们英国论文通AssignmentPass辅导网，点击上方栏目列表，我们有毕业论文代写、Essay代写、Assignment代写和PS代写等各种服务等着你，客服24小时在线，欢迎咨询!
